IES Management College And Research Centre

Does State Ownership of Banks Matter? : Russian Evidence from the Financial Crisis

Davydov, Denis

Does State Ownership of Banks Matter? : Russian Evidence from the Financial Crisis - 250–285 p.

This article examines the effects of state ownership and government interventions on lending behaviour and capitalisation of banks over the period 2005–2011. Using data from the highly state-influenced Russian banking sector, it is documented that the relationship between state ownership and lending is nonlinear. While overall loan growth decreased and interest rates rose, it was found that fully state-controlled banks increased lending and charged lower interest rates during the crisis of 2008–2010. Moreover, fully state-owned and state-supported banks demonstrated counter-cyclical lending behaviour during the crisis. However, while state-owned banks were better protected against asset default, there is weak evidence to suggest that government interventions may result in increased riskiness of banks.

Bank lending, state ownership, privatisation financial crisis, government interventions

Circulation Timings: Monday to Saturday: 8:30 AM to 9:30 PM | Sundays/Bank Holiday during Examination Period: 10:00 AM to 6:00 PM