Spatial Market Integration of Arhar (Split) Wholesale Prices in India : Application of Vector Error Correction Model (Record no. 49755)
[ view plain ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 02074nam a2200193 4500 |
| 003 - CONTROL NUMBER IDENTIFIER | |
| control field | OSt |
| 005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION | |
| control field | 20180512125528.0 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
| fixed length control field | 180512b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d |
| 100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Savadatti, Pushpa |
| 9 (RLIN) | 31479 |
| 245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Spatial Market Integration of Arhar (Split) Wholesale Prices in India : Application of Vector Error Correction Model |
| 300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION | |
| Extent | 21-29 p. |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc | The present study aimed at analysing the spatial market integration of arhar markets in India, based on the monthly wholesale prices of arhar (split) in Mumbai (Maharashtra), Hyderabad (Telangana), Chennai (Tamil Nadu), and Bangalore (Karnataka) markets for the period from January 2011 to December 2015. The Augmented Dickey Fuller test indicated that Mumbai, Chennai, and Hyderabad arhar market price series were I(1), but that of the Bangalore arhar market, the price series were I(2) ; hence, further analysis was carried out for these three markets only. The results of Johansen co-integration test indicated that three arhar markets were significantly co-integrated with each other. The VECM model revealed that speed of adjustment for Mumbai and Hyderabad markets was statistically significant, but for Chennai market, it was insignificant, though having an expected negative sign. The Granger causality test indicated unidirectional relationship between the markets. The speed of price transmission was slow for all the three markets. This may be due to reasons such as lack of proper infrastructural facilities, paucity of institutional arrangements, transport costs, and absence of good government policies. This calls for more efforts on the part of the government in removing these constraints so that there will be efficient flow of price information among the domestic arhar markets in India. |
| 653 ## - INDEX TERM--UNCONTROLLED | |
| Uncontrolled term | Stationarity |
| Uncontrolled term | Co-Integration |
| Uncontrolled term | Error Correction Model |
| Uncontrolled term | Granger Causality |
| 773 0# - HOST ITEM ENTRY | |
| Host Biblionumber | 30302 |
| Host Itemnumber | 70366 |
| Main entry heading | GILANI, MEENAKSHI |
| Place, publisher, and date of publication | INDIAN JOURNAL OF MARKETING 2012 NEW DELHI |
| Other item identifier | 5558691 |
| Title | INDIAN JOURNAL OF MARKETING |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
| Source of classification or shelving scheme | Dewey Decimal Classification |
| Koha item type | Journal Article |
| Withdrawn status | Lost status | Source of classification or shelving scheme | Damaged status | Not for loan | Home library | Current library | Date acquired | Total Checkouts | Full call number | Barcode | Date last seen | Price effective from |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dewey Decimal Classification | Main Library | Main Library | 12/05/2018 | Vol 48, No 4/ 5558691JA2 | 5558691JA2 | 12/05/2018 | 12/05/2018 |