IES Management College And Research Centre

Strong or Weak Synergy? Revising the Assumption of Team-Related Advantages in Integrative Negotiations (Record no. 52801)

MARC details
000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 02281nam a22002177a 4500
003 - CONTROL NUMBER IDENTIFIER
control field OSt
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION
control field 20191118173756.0
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 191118b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Hüffmeier, Joachim
9 (RLIN) 13369
245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Strong or Weak Synergy? Revising the Assumption of Team-Related Advantages in Integrative Negotiations
300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION
Extent 2721-2750 p.
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc When negotiations are complex and consequential, organizations usually send teams rather than individuals to the negotiation table because teams are expected to provide additional beneficial negotiation processes and, thus, generate superior outcomes. Similarly, theoretical accounts of integrative negotiations assume higher outcomes for teams than for individual negotiators as a consequence of team-related advantages (e.g., increased information processing and problem-solving capabilities). In this study, we challenge this established assumption and across three negotiations and various empirical tests, we show that the advantages of teams are merely the result of individual-level processes (i.e., one person asking interest-related questions). Moreover, Bayesian estimation supported our claim and rejected the extant account: The probability of the teams achieving better outcomes than the best individuals in commensurate nominal groups (i.e., strong synergy) was up to four times smaller than the probability of the teams not achieving better results than the best individuals in commensurate nominal groups. Finally, in the majority of our analyses, individual negotiators generated better relationship outcomes than teams even though the economic outcomes were comparable. On the basis of these results, we revise the assumption of team-related advantages in integrative negotiations. We discuss the implications of our results for future negotiation research and for the practical assignment of teams or individuals to negotiations.
653 ## - INDEX TERM--UNCONTROLLED
Uncontrolled term team negotiation
Uncontrolled term synergy
Uncontrolled term integrative negotiation
700 ## - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Zerres, Alfred
9 (RLIN) 13369
Personal name Freund , Philipp Alexander
9 (RLIN) 34927
Relator code et. al.
773 0# - HOST ITEM ENTRY
Host Biblionumber 29017
Host Itemnumber 77320
Main entry heading DEBORAH E. RUPP
Place, publisher, and date of publication WEST LAFAYETTE SAGE PUBLICATION 2012
Other item identifier 55511131
Title JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT
International Standard Serial Number 0149-2063
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Source of classification or shelving scheme Dewey Decimal Classification
Koha item type Journal Article
Holdings
Withdrawn status Lost status Source of classification or shelving scheme Damaged status Not for loan Home library Current library Date acquired Total Checkouts Full call number Barcode Date last seen Price effective from
    Dewey Decimal Classification     Main Library Main Library 18/11/2019   Vol 45, Issue 7 /55511131JA4 55511131JA4 18/11/2019 18/11/2019

Circulation Timings: Monday to Saturday: 8:30 AM to 9:30 PM | Sundays/Bank Holiday during Examination Period: 10:00 AM to 6:00 PM