Creative problem solving (CPS) requires solutions to be useful and original. Typically,its operations span problem finding ,idea generation, and critical evaluation.The benefits of training CPS have been extolled in education,industry,and government with evidence showing it can enhance performance.However,although such training schemes work,less is know about the specific tools used. Knowing whether a particular tool works or not would provide practitioners with a valuable resource,leading to more effective training schemes, and a better understanding of the processes involved. A comprehensive review was undertaken examining the empirical support of tools used within CPS. Despite the surprising lack of research focusing on the use and success of specific tools,some evidence exists to support the effectiveness of a small set. Such findings present practitioners with a potential resource that could be used in a standalone setting or possibly be combined to create more effective training programs