The Value of Marketing Crowdsourced New Products as Such: Evidence from Two Randomized Field Experiments
Material type: TextDescription: 525-539. pSubject(s): In: ERDEN, TULIN JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCHSummary: To complement their in-house, designer-driven efforts, companies are increasingly experimenting with crowdsourcing initiatives in which they invite their user communities to generate new product ideas. Although innovation scholars have begun to analyze the objective promise of crowdsourcing, the current research is unique in pointing out that merely marketing the source of design to customers might bring about an incremental increase in product sales. The findings from two randomized field experiments reveal that labeling crowdsourced new products as such—that is, marketing the product as “customer-ideated” at the point of purchase versus not mentioning the specific source of design—increased the product’s actual market performance by up to 20%. Two controlled follow-up studies reveal that the effect observed in two distinct consumer goods domains (food and electronics) can be attributed to a quality inference: consumers perceive “customer-ideated” products to be based on ideas that address their needs more effectively, and the corresponding design mode is considered superior in generating promising new products.Item type | Current library | Call number | Vol info | Status | Notes | Date due | Barcode | Item holds | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Journal Article | Main Library | Vol 74, No 4/ 5557769JA2 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Available | 5557769JA2 | |||||
Journals and Periodicals | Main Library On Display | JRNL/GEN/Vol 54, No 4/5557769 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Vol 54, No 4 (01/04/2017) | Not for loan | August, 2017 | 5557769 |
Browsing Main Library shelves Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
Vol 7, No 3/ 5559175JA3 Swachh Bharat Mission : A Missed Opportunity for the Indian Economy | Vol 74, No 4/ 5557769JA1 Incentives Versus Reciprocity: Insights from a Field Experiment | Vol 74, No 4/ 5557769JA10 Mobility of Top Marketing and Sales Executives in Business-to-Business Markets: A Social Network Perspective | Vol 74, No 4/ 5557769JA2 The Value of Marketing Crowdsourced New Products as Such: Evidence from Two Randomized Field Experiments | Vol 74, No 4/ 5557769JA3 Who’s Driving This Conversation? Systematic Biases in the Content of Online Consumer Discussions | Vol 74, No 4/ 5557769JA4 Comparison Neglect in Upgrade Decisions | Vol 74, No 4/ 5557769JA5 How Language Shapes Word of Mouth’s Impact |
To complement their in-house, designer-driven efforts, companies are increasingly experimenting with crowdsourcing initiatives in which they invite their user communities to generate new product ideas. Although innovation scholars have begun to analyze the objective promise of crowdsourcing, the current research is unique in pointing out that merely marketing the source of design to customers might bring about an incremental increase in product sales. The findings from two randomized field experiments reveal that labeling crowdsourced new products as such—that is, marketing the product as “customer-ideated” at the point of purchase versus not mentioning the specific source of design—increased the product’s actual market performance by up to 20%. Two controlled follow-up studies reveal that the effect observed in two distinct consumer goods domains (food and electronics) can be attributed to a quality inference: consumers perceive “customer-ideated” products to be based on ideas that address their needs more effectively, and the corresponding design mode is considered superior in generating promising new products.
There are no comments on this title.