Lending Relationships, Borrowing Costs and Crisis: Evidence from Indian Micro Data
Material type: TextDescription: 1026-1051 PSubject(s): In: BANIK, ARINDAM GLOBAL BUSINESS REVIEWSummary: The analysis employs data on Indian listed firms from 1996 to 2010 to explore several hypotheses relating to the costs of lending relationships. The evidence indicates that smaller, established, levered and high-growth firms charge higher interest rates. In addition, capitalized firms charge lower rates, and both bank and firm ownership do have a role to play in influencing borrowing costs.Item type | Current library | Call number | Vol info | Status | Notes | Date due | Barcode | Item holds | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Journal Article | Main Library | /Vol 20, No 4/ 55511087JA13 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Available | 55511087JA13 | |||||
Journals and Periodicals | Main Library On Display | JP/GEN/Vol 20, No 4/55511087 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Vol 20, No 4 (10/07/2019) | Not for loan | August, 2019 | 55511087 |
Browsing Main Library shelves Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
/Vol 20, No 3/ 5559440JA10 Major Determinants of Infant Mortality District-level Evidences from Odisha | /Vol 20, No 3/ 5559440JA11 Performance of CEmONC Centres in Public Hospitals of Tamil Nadu | /Vol 20, No 3/ 5559440JA5 Modelling Trends in Contraception Usage in Nigeria and Ghana | /Vol 20, No 4/ 55511087JA13 Lending Relationships, Borrowing Costs and Crisis: Evidence from Indian Micro Data | /Vol 21, No 1/ 55510281JA9 Selective Universalism: The Paradoxical Strategy to Achieve Universal Health Coverage in India | /Vol 21, No 2/ 55510585JA1 Prevalence of Obstetric Fistula and Associated Factors in Rajasthan, India | /Vol 21, No 3/ 55511169JA1 Resource Partitioning and Hospital Specialization |
The analysis employs data on Indian listed firms from 1996 to 2010 to explore several hypotheses relating to the costs of lending relationships. The evidence indicates that smaller, established, levered and high-growth firms charge higher interest rates. In addition, capitalized firms charge lower rates, and both bank and firm ownership do have a role to play in influencing borrowing costs.
There are no comments on this title.