000 | nam a22 7a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
999 |
_c48528 _d48528 |
||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20171101161242.0 | ||
008 | 171101b xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
100 |
_aKopalle, Praveen K. _928272 |
||
245 | _aThe Effects of Advertised Quality Emphasis and Objective Quality on Sales | ||
300 | _a114-126 p. | ||
520 | _aGiven that consumers value quality, and advertising content informs consumers’ beliefs about quality, it is not surprising that high-quality brands emphasize quality in their advertising content. What is less obvious is whether firms with lower-quality brands should also follow suit and emphasize quality in their advertising to signal a higher quality. We examine this issue and study the effectiveness of quality-based advertising messages. Our field study relates brands’ monthly sales to their advertised quality claims across 1,876 print ads in national magazines and Consumer Reports–based product quality ratings over more than two decades. Contrary to the generally held yet erroneous belief in the efficacy of low-quality products emphasizing quality in their advertising, we demonstrate that (1) it is not beneficial for a low-quality firm to emphasize quality in its advertising, and (2) it is effective for a high-quality firm to do so. An analysis of parameter values from a published category-agnostic simulation and an experiment that examines consumers’ responses to quality claims in a second product category yields convergent insights. | ||
653 | _aAdvertised Quality Emphasis | ||
653 | _aObjective Quality | ||
653 | _aQuality-Based Strategies | ||
653 | _aConsumer Durables | ||
700 |
_aFisher, Robert J. _928273 |
||
700 |
_aSud, Bharat L. _928274 |
||
700 |
_aAntia, Kersi D. _928275 |
||
773 | 0 |
_029537 _965586 _aFRAZIER GARY L. _o5557519 _tJOURNAL OF MARKETING _x0022-2429 |
|
942 |
_2ddc _cJA-ARTICLE |