| 000 | nam a22 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 999 |
_c49592 _d49592 |
||
| 003 | OSt | ||
| 005 | 20180416184656.0 | ||
| 008 | 180416b xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 100 |
_aZona, Fabio _931124 |
||
| 245 | _aBoard Interlocks and Firm Performance: Toward a Combined Agency–Resource Dependence Perspective | ||
| 300 | _a589–618 P. | ||
| 520 | _aThis study develops a combined agency–resource dependence perspective and applies it to the study of interlocking directorates. It suggests that interlocking directorates may exert either a positive or a negative effect on subsequent firm performance, depending on the firm’s relative resources, power imbalance, ownership concentration, and CEO ownership. A test on a sample of 145 Italian companies provides support for hypothesized effects. This study suggests that integrating agency and resource dependence theories provides a higher-order explanation of firm performance and helps advance both agency and resource dependence theories. | ||
| 653 | _aresource dependence | ||
| 653 | _aagency theory, | ||
| 653 | _aboards of directors | ||
| 700 |
_aGomez-Mejia,Luis R. _931125 |
||
| 700 |
_aWithers, Michael C. _931126 |
||
| 773 | 0 |
_029017 _970281 _aDEBORAH E. RUPP _dWEST LAFAYETTE SAGE PUBLICATION 2012 _o5558626 _tJOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT _x 0149-2063 |
|
| 942 |
_2ddc _cJA-ARTICLE |
||