000 | 02017nam a2200229 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
999 |
_c52428 _d52428 |
||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20190814183430.0 | ||
008 | 190814b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
100 |
_aPorter, Christopher O. L. H. _934190 |
||
245 | _aThe Use of Online Panel Data in Management Research: A Review and Recommendations | ||
300 | _a319-344 p. | ||
520 | _aManagement scholars have long depended on convenience samples to conduct research involving human participants. However, the past decade has seen an emergence of a new convenience sample: online panels and online panel participants. The data these participants provide—online panel data (OPD)—has been embraced by many management scholars owing to the numerous benefits it provides over “traditional” convenience samples. Despite those advantages, OPD has not been warmly received by all. Currently, there is a divide in the field over the appropriateness of OPD in management scholarship. Our review takes aim at the divide with the goal of providing a common understanding of OPD and its utility and providing recommendations regarding when and how to use OPD and how and where to publish it. To accomplish these goals, we inventoried and reviewed OPD use across 13 management journals spanning 2006 to 2017. Our search resulted in 804 OPD-based studies across 439 articles. Notably, our search also identified 26 online panel platforms (“brokers”) used to connect researchers with online panel participants. Importantly, we offer specific guidance to authors, reviewers, and editors, having implications for both micro and macro management scholars. | ||
653 | _aOnline panel data | ||
653 | _aResearch methods | ||
653 | _aSsampling | ||
653 | _aConvenience sample | ||
700 |
_aOutlaw, Ryan _934191 |
||
700 |
_aGale, Jake P. _934192 |
||
700 |
_aCho, Thomas S. _913614 |
||
773 | 0 |
_029017 _974525 _aDEBORAH E. RUPP _dWEST LAFAYETTE SAGE PUBLICATION 2012 _o55510284 _tJOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT _x 0149-2063 |
|
942 |
_2ddc _cJA-ARTICLE |