The role of formal information sharing in key account team effectiveness: does informal control matter and when
Material type:![Text](/opac-tmpl/lib/famfamfam/BK.png)
Item type | Current library | Call number | Vol info | Status | Notes | Date due | Barcode | Item holds | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
Main Library | Vol 37, No 4/ 5558343JA4 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Available | 5558343JA4 | |||||
![]() |
Main Library On Display | JRNL/MAR/Vol 37, No 4/5558343 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Vol 37, No 4 (01/10/2017) | Not for loan | December, 2017 | 5558343 |
Team selling is a useful approach for retaining strategically important accounts in business-to-business markets. For key account sales teams, ensuring adequate access to information about customer needs offers sustainable competitive advantages. However, the internal alignment of market information remains a recurring managerial issue in key account team selling. This study develops a moderated mediation model to identify management strategies that encourage team members' formal information sharing, which in turn improves team effectiveness. Analysis of a multilevel data set comprising 37 fluid key account teams reveals that customer orientation and task interdependence increase formal information sharing among team members. Managers' exercise of professional control strengthens the positive impact that formal information sharing has on team satisfaction. However, the practice has a dysfunctional influence on the positive effect of task interdependence on formal information sharing. Firms with key account management (KAM) programs must decide whether the marginal benefits attained by advocating such professional control outweigh the possible drawbacks.
There are no comments on this title.